From ski-jump carriers to forest clearings, the question of how a military aircraft gets airborne without a full runway has generated five different answers — and each one trades payload, range and mechanical complexity in a different way.
Conventional Takeoff and Landing is what most aircraft do. A ground roll accelerates the aircraft to flying speed, wings take over, and a runway absorbs the landing impact. CTOL requires the least mechanical complexity and allows maximum fuel and weapons because all engine power goes into forward thrust rather than vertical lift. The trade-off is infrastructure: a CTOL fighter needs a runway at least 1,500–2,000 ft long for a loaded takeoff. Destroy the runway and the aircraft is grounded.
Vertical Takeoff and Landing means the aircraft lifts off straight up and lands straight down. To hover, a fixed-wing aircraft must produce thrust equal to its own weight. A Harrier hovering at 25,000 lb gross weight burns roughly 3,800 lb of fuel per hour — while covering zero distance. In pure VTOL mode, the same aircraft can carry very little beyond itself: in Falklands-era conditions, takeoff weight left only around 2,000–3,000 lb of weapons and fuel after hover reserves. Engine wear in the high-power hover regime also accumulates faster than in cruise. These constraints explain why pure VTOL fighters have never entered large-scale service.
Short Takeoff, Vertical Landing is the answer that the Harrier family and the F-35B converged on independently: take off with a short ground roll or ski-jump, land vertically on return. A short ground roll lasting just 300–500 ft lets the aircraft build forward airspeed before the wing generates lift — so the engine only needs to provide the extra thrust to accelerate, not support the full aircraft weight. The same Harrier that could barely lift itself in pure VTOL can carry 7,700 lb of weapons on a short-takeoff departure. On return, fuel burn has reduced the aircraft to perhaps 60% of max takeoff weight, making a vertical landing achievable without straining the engine.
Short Takeoff, Barrier-Arrested Recovery combines the ski-jump takeoff with arrested landing. Russian and Chinese carriers — the Admiral Kuznetsov, Liaoning, and Shandong — use this system. Without a catapult, the aircraft must reach flying speed under its own power before reaching the end of the ramp, constraining maximum takeoff weight. The arrested landing is identical to CATOBAR: a tail hook catches a transverse wire, stopping the aircraft in about 300 ft.
Catapult-Assisted Takeoff, Barrier-Arrested Recovery is used by American supercarriers and France's Charles de Gaulle. A steam or electromagnetic catapult adds roughly 30–40 knots to the aircraft's speed at the bow — equivalent to extra wing area, allowing the aircraft to carry its full combat load. The arrested landing applies roughly 30 million foot-pounds of kinetic energy stopping the aircraft from touchdown at around 150 mph.
The Hawker Siddeley Harrier, which entered RAF service in 1969, used one Rolls-Royce Pegasus turbofan with four rotating nozzles — two cold-stream forward, two hot-stream aft. At 82 degrees the 21,500 lb static thrust supports hover at light combat weights. Four small reaction control jets fed by engine bleed air provide directional control when airspeed is too low to load the control surfaces. Despite limitations, the Harrier flew 2,376 sorties from HMS Hermes and Invincible in the Falklands without an air-to-air loss, shooting down 23 Argentine aircraft.
The F-35B achieves STOVL with three separate thrust sources balanced precisely in hover. The Pratt & Whitney F135 drives a Rolls-Royce LiftSystem: a large fan immediately behind the cockpit, driven by a shaft from the F135 low-pressure turbine, exhausting downward through a door in the fuselage. Simultaneously, the F135's exhaust nozzle vectors to 95 degrees. Two roll-post nozzles on the wings bleed hot gas for roll control. The LiftFan produces about 18,000 lb of lift; the vectored nozzle about 18,000 lb. The flight control computer manages all three continuously — making the F-35B hover easier to fly than the Harrier, at the cost of a 3,000-lb weight penalty from the LiftFan shaft and gearbox. The F-35B carries 2,500 lb less internal fuel than the CTOL F-35A as a result.
The Bell-Boeing V-22 Osprey rotates the entire engine and rotor assembly: in hover the two 38-ft rotors point upward like helicopter rotors; once airborne, the nacelles tilt forward 90 degrees, converting the rotors to propellers and the Osprey into a turboprop aircraft with a cruise speed of 280 knots — roughly twice what a CH-47 Chinook manages. The V-22 can self-deploy 2,100 nautical miles and carry 24 combat-loaded troops at that speed. The limitation is the conversion envelope: between helicopter and aeroplane mode, vortex ring state is a risk if the pilot descends too fast at low airspeed — the failure mode in a 2000 crash that killed 19 Marines during operational testing.
In hover, every pound of thrust going downward is a pound not going forward; every second of hover burns fuel that could have been used for combat radius. A fighter that takes off vertically arrives at the target area with less fuel, fewer weapons, and a more fatigued engine than one that used a runway or ski-jump. The runway problem is easier to solve with logistics and pre-positioned infrastructure than with propulsion engineering — at least until propulsion technology changes the energy equation.
© 2026 Who That Plane?! — Learn index