F-15 Eagle vs Mikoyan MiG-31

Spec-driven on-paper analysis — who wins what scenario.

F-15 Eagle
F-15 Eagle
Mikoyan MiG-31
Mikoyan MiG-31

Spec table

SpecF-15 EagleMikoyan MiG-31
Max speed (mph) (mph) 1,650 1,864
Max speed (Mach) (Mach) 2.5 2.83
Combat radius / range (mi) 3,450 1,680
Service ceiling (ft) 65,000 67,600
MTOW (lb) 68,000 90,389
Empty weight (lb) 28,000 48,115
Payload (lb) 23,000 4,000
Endurance (hr) 4 3
Length (ft) 63.8 74.4
Wingspan (ft) 42.8 44.2
Thrust-to-weight ratio (MTOW) 0.85 0.76

Green = leader on that dimension. Higher is treated as better for all rows shown.

On-paper verdict

Beyond Visual Range (BVR, > 40 nm)

Mikoyan MiG-31 entered service 5 years later, so it generally fields a more modern radar generation (AESA vs. mechanically-scanned arrays in older airframes) and longer-range BVR weapons. In BVR engagements, the newer-radar aircraft typically wins the first-shot opportunity.

Within Visual Range (WVR, dogfight)

F-15 Eagle carries a thrust-to-weight ratio of 0.85 versus 0.76 for Mikoyan MiG-31 (using MTOW; combat-weight T/W is meaningfully higher for both). The higher T/W gives F-15 Eagle better instantaneous acceleration after a turn, better energy retention through a sustained turn, and a more vertical fight option. Mikoyan MiG-31 likely depends more on energy-management discipline to come out on top in a knife fight.

High-altitude intercept

Mikoyan MiG-31 is faster (Mach 2.83 vs 2.5) AND has a higher service ceiling (67,600 ft vs 65,000 ft), so it dominates the high-altitude intercept profile — chasing down a bomber at the edge of the atmosphere is its kind of fight.

Strike / strategic mission

F-15 Eagle reaches 3,450 mi unrefueled — 105% more range than the other (1,680 mi). In strike profiles where the target sits deep behind enemy lines, the longer-legged aircraft engages without tanker support. F-15 Eagle carries 23,000 lb of payload (475% more), letting it hit the target with more weapons or stand off with larger / longer-range munitions.

Caveat: these scenarios are on paper. Real combat outcomes hinge on pilot skill, training quality, doctrine, tactics, electronic warfare, radar generation upgrades, missile choices, and ground-controlled intercept support — none of which fit into a spec table. Treat as a starting point for further research, not a verdict.

Frequently asked questions

Which is more agile, F-15 Eagle or Mikoyan MiG-31?

By thrust-to-weight ratio (a strong proxy for instantaneous turn performance), F-15 Eagle leads with 0.85 versus 0.76. Agility in actual combat also depends on wing loading, flight-control law, pilot skill, and energy-management discipline.

Which has the longer combat radius?

F-15 Eagle: 3450 mi vs 1680 mi (manufacturer-published unrefueled range; actual combat radius is typically 30-50% lower depending on weapons load and reserves).

Which has the more modern radar / avionics?

F-15 Eagle entered service in 1976, Mikoyan MiG-31 in 1981. The newer-service-entry airframe usually carries a more modern radar generation, though both have received upgrades over their lifetime.

Could they realistically face each other in combat?

Both are operated by major air forces. Whether they have actually flown against each other in combat or only in exercises depends on the specific airframes and political climate. The reference pages link to documented service histories.

Is this comparison authoritative?

No. This is a spec-driven on-paper analysis. Real combat outcomes are dominated by pilot skill, training quality, doctrine, tactics, ground-controlled-intercept support, electronic warfare, and weapons-loadout choices — none of which appear in the public spec sheet. Treat this as a starting point for further research, not a verdict.

Sources

Spec values pulled from each aircraft's reference page in the gallery, which aggregates manufacturer-published figures with Wikipedia-cited sources:

Part of the Who That Plane?! aerospace gallery — 5,400+ aircraft, helicopters, missiles, and spacecraft. See the most iconic vehicles, track live aircraft, or learn about flight tracking.