Spec-driven on-paper analysis — who wins what scenario.
| Spec | Boeing AH-64 Apache | Mil Mi-24 Hind |
|---|---|---|
| Max speed (mph) (mph) | 182 | 208 |
| Max speed (Mach) (Mach) | 0.28 | 0.31 |
| Combat radius / range (mi) | 1,180 | 280 |
| Service ceiling (ft) | 21,000 | 14,760 |
| MTOW (lb) | 23,000 | 26,455 |
| Empty weight (lb) | 11,387 | 18,960 |
| Payload (lb) | 3,986 | 5,291 |
| Endurance (hr) | 2.5 | 3 |
| Length (ft) | 58.2 | 70.5 |
| Wingspan (ft) | 48 | 56.8 |
| Thrust-to-weight ratio (MTOW) | 0.17 | 0.17 |
Green = leader on that dimension. Higher is treated as better for all rows shown.
Boeing AH-64 Apache entered service 14 years later, so it generally fields a more modern radar generation (AESA vs. mechanically-scanned arrays in older airframes) and longer-range BVR weapons. In BVR engagements, the newer-radar aircraft typically wins the first-shot opportunity.
Boeing AH-64 Apache carries a thrust-to-weight ratio of 0.17 versus 0.17 for Mil Mi-24 Hind (using MTOW; combat-weight T/W is meaningfully higher for both). The higher T/W gives Boeing AH-64 Apache better instantaneous acceleration after a turn, better energy retention through a sustained turn, and a more vertical fight option. Mil Mi-24 Hind likely depends more on energy-management discipline to come out on top in a knife fight.
Mil Mi-24 Hind has the speed advantage (Mach 0.31 vs 0.28); Boeing AH-64 Apache has the altitude advantage (21,000 ft vs 14,760 ft). Whoever owns the intercept depends on the target's flight profile.
Boeing AH-64 Apache reaches 1,180 mi unrefueled — 321% more range than the other (280 mi). In strike profiles where the target sits deep behind enemy lines, the longer-legged aircraft engages without tanker support. Mil Mi-24 Hind carries 5,291 lb of payload (33% more), letting it hit the target with more weapons or stand off with larger / longer-range munitions.
By thrust-to-weight ratio (a strong proxy for instantaneous turn performance), Boeing AH-64 Apache leads with 0.17 versus 0.17. Agility in actual combat also depends on wing loading, flight-control law, pilot skill, and energy-management discipline.
Boeing AH-64 Apache: 1180 mi vs 280 mi (manufacturer-published unrefueled range; actual combat radius is typically 30-50% lower depending on weapons load and reserves).
Boeing AH-64 Apache entered service in 1986, Mil Mi-24 Hind in 1972. The newer-service-entry airframe usually carries a more modern radar generation, though both have received upgrades over their lifetime.
Both are operated by major air forces. Whether they have actually flown against each other in combat or only in exercises depends on the specific airframes and political climate. The reference pages link to documented service histories.
No. This is a spec-driven on-paper analysis. Real combat outcomes are dominated by pilot skill, training quality, doctrine, tactics, ground-controlled-intercept support, electronic warfare, and weapons-loadout choices — none of which appear in the public spec sheet. Treat this as a starting point for further research, not a verdict.
Spec values pulled from each aircraft's reference page in the gallery, which aggregates manufacturer-published figures with Wikipedia-cited sources:
Part of the Who That Plane?! aerospace gallery — 5,400+ aircraft, helicopters, missiles, and spacecraft. See the most iconic vehicles, track live aircraft, or learn about flight tracking.